If you ask nearly all the world's climate scientists,Watch Passenger 69 XXX there's simply no debate: The planet is warming as amounts of greenhouse gases rise in the air -- and human activity is primarily to blame.
But Scott Pruitt, head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, insists on debating climate change. And that debate, apparently, might be televised, Reuters reported on Tuesday.
SEE ALSO: Antarctic ice shelf crack is moving at record speeds, poised to cleave off massive iceberg any minuteDoubters of mainstream climate science, including Pruitt, argue that dissenting views haven't been heard by the scientific community. They falsely claim that plenty of questions still remain about the scientific evidence for human-caused global warming.
In reality, however, while there is uncertainty about how quickly and severely rising temperatures will affect the planet, there's virtually no doubt among climate scientists that climate change is happening -- and that it's happening because of us.
By calling for a debate, Pruitt creates a false narrative that casts his critics as stubborn, inflexible bullies who are hell-bent on destroying the fossil fuel industry. In this scenario, climate scientists and their allies are jealously guarding the climate discussion. Why don't other folks, like coal company executives, get to have a say?
Rather than inform the public, all this does is cast clouds of distrust and disbelief over the scientific community. That's why climate scientists say calls for such debates are disconcerting: According to the Trump administration, satellite observations, ground measurements, field research, and deeply scrutinized results -- gathered over decades and from across the globe -- simply aren't sufficiently convincing.
In the interview with Reuters, Pruitt called for a "robust discussion" about climate change, though he didn't explain how the scientists participating in that discussion would be chosen.
Asked if the debate should be televised, Pruitt told Reuters: "I think so. I think so. I mean, I don’t know yet, but you want this to be open to the world. You want this to be on full display. I think the American people would be very interested in consuming that. I think they deserve it."
The TV debate would likely build on or coincide with the Trump administration's plans to host so-called "red team, blue team" debates on climate science.
Pruitt, who denies that carbon dioxide is the main cause of global warming (it is), would reportedly help pick the experts. He's floated the idea in recent weeks, saying such discussions would be modeled on processes used for evaluating military battle plans and ways that spacecraft engineers test critical systems or investigate accidents.
Many climate scientists said they see this plan as a direct assault on the scientific process. Looping in non-experts to debate climate science would be like asking a person who likes looking at the stars to go head-to-head with actual astronomers and physicists.
"It's one thing to respond to legitimate scientific criticism, quite another to refute unconstrained nonsense," Kate Marvel, a scientist at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, previously told Mashable.
Yahoo Answers is shutting downTrump's Twitter account was down for a hot second and everyone lost their sh*tA timeline of whatever the hell is happening between Justin Bieber and Selena GomezI'm polyamorous, and Facebook doesn't think my sexuality existsPapa John's blames NFL protests for sales slump — uh, what?This Airbnb is made entirely out of LEGO and you can spend the nightThe cost of everyday fertilizer: A radioactive flood threat in FloridaA timeline of whatever the hell is happening between Justin Bieber and Selena GomezTrump's Twitter account was down for a hot second and everyone lost their sh*tTrippy nebula captured in brilliant new Hubble imageEverything to know about Netflix's 'Shadow and Bone'Matt Gaetz and his friend are very bad at technologyGoogle's I/O 2021 developer conference will be virtual and 'free'Trump Jr. went as his dad for Halloween because he is a desperate man'Bridgerton' fans yearn as RegéAudible now finds the best parts of romance novels for youBath bomb destruction videos are a satisfying way to waste timeTim Cook says he never met Elon Musk, is very coy about Apple CarLebron James reveals GMC's Hummer EV SUV during NCAA Final Four gameThis guy proposed dressed as Master Chief Clever rabbits ride sheep to escape flood Disney plans Lion King sequel with 'Moonlight' director Barry Jenkins J.K. Rowling only needed 3 tweets to turn the tables on these trolls John McCain, ever the political dramatist, has always understood the value of TV comedy Quiz: Who said it? Anthony Scaramucci or a Real Housewife? The secret lexicon of the Kardashians' Instagram comments Google's $699 Pixel 5 and $499 Pixel 4a 5G are finally official Pantone's new 'Period' colour tackles menstruation stigma British politicians' official portraits get the inevitable caption treatment The internet descends upon this super hot selfie of the Queen's former page boy This little monocular telescope fits in your bag — and it's on sale The Boy Scouts are really, really sorry about that Trump speech Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a 144Hz display, 5,000mAh battery Google announces its new $99 smart speaker, Nest Audio What to expect at Google's 'Launch Night In' 2020 hardware event 'Star Wars: Squadrons' review: The perfect 2020s spin on a '90s fave A wealthy human just purchased Trump's drawing of, uh, whatever that thing is Brilliant New York Post cover perfectly sums up Trump's White House Everything Google announced at its 'Launch Night In' event Pinterest adds to ban on promotion of culturally insensitive costumes
1.9781s , 10133.1484375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Watch Passenger 69 XXX】,Defense Information Network