【Watch 17 Sexual Fantasies Of Mens (2018)】

Have you ever made a cringeworthy mistake in a Facebook post?Watch 17 Sexual Fantasies Of Mens (2018) Don't lie, the answer is yes.

If you have a sense of shame, Facebook at least allows you to go back and correct your gaffe by editing the post, a feature that certain other social media networks still haven't added.

But evidence of your slip-up lived on with the tiny "Edited" label on the bottom of the post, signaling to your followers that you cared just enough to correct yourself on the internet. Sad.

Apparently, however, that's no longer the case. It seems that Facebook has removed the on-post edited label, making it much more difficult to know when someone actually took the time to fix their mistake.

SEE ALSO: Your News Feed will never be safe again: Facebook Live can now be broadcast from computers

In order to actually know whether or not your eyes were playing tricks on you when a friend's rant no longer has 15 spelling errors the second time you see it, you'll need to do some digging. Here's how the new editing looks, courtesy of my colleague Raymond Wong and his doubts about how cool the upcoming Nintendo Switch actually is.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Original Post

His original post simply shared a link.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Edited Post

I noticed that he added a comment about the Switch, so I checked out the post information, via the drop-down menu. To see what happened, I have to view the edit history.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Check out the edit history

When I look at his edit history, I can see all the changes that were made.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

In most cases, this type of editing isn't a big deal, but the move to hide post edit labels takes away one of the few features that provided any transparency for our online behavior. This raises one of the biggest ethical questions that has long plagued social media and the way we interact on the internet: Should we have the power to instantly, surreptitiously rewrite our wrongs to preserve our online image?

When asked about the change, Facebook reps acknowledged that this is a different editing system than it had before, but the change was made about a year ago. It appears that the rollout took some time to reach most users — or we just didn't notice when posts started changing without any acknowledgment.

(This story was updated to reflect Facebook's response about the change).

---

Featured Video For You

---

Facebook stalkers confess their dark secrets

---

Topics Social Media

• Digital Culture
• Shopping
• Entertainment
• Deals
• Life
• Science
• Games
• Social Good

• Q&A with tendercare founder and CEO Shauna Sweeney
• A grandma floated out to sea on a large throne of ice and had to be rescued
• Review: ViewRanger is a solid maps app for outdoor adventurers
• 'I am young, I am gay, I am black': Trailblazing politician enters Aussie parliament
• Best IPL deal: Save $80 on Braun IPL Silk·Expert
• This 1 Simpsons
• Instagram is the most used platform for grooming crimes, report finds
• Airbnb proposes new rules for New York as deadline for state bill approaches
• Analyzing Graphics Card Pricing: May 2018
• Trump did say his accusers aren't attractive enough to assault

• Google deploys new AI tool to COVID
• Electric hypercar maker Rimac takes over VW's Bugatti
• Tesla Model S Plaid blasts off in reviews, even without a gear shifter
• You're using your air fryer all wrong
• Facebook launches newsletter platform Bulletin
• Richard Branson is flying into space, nine days before Jeff Bezos
• Two koalas fight it out on the road, because they're not all cute
• Volvo concept car previews its all
• Olivia Munn speaks out on Hollywood harassment
• Bitcast gives you sexual pleasure from your Bitcoin investments

• Today's Hurdle hints and answers for April 17, 2025
• How to talk about puberty in a gender
• Hillary Clinton just dropped the other p
• Ethereum's Constantinople upgrade goes as planned
• Best portable power station deal: Save $179.01 on the EcoFlow River 2 Max
• Clinton calls out Trump for being a sore loser about the Emmys
• Van Jones' analysis of the final debate: 'You can't polish that turd'
• 'Captain Marvel' brings back '90s optical illusions with new posters
• Better Buy: Previous
• Trump did say his accusers aren't attractive enough to assault

• Best Hydro Flask deal: Save $10 on a 24
• Clinton calls out Trump for being a sore loser about the Emmys
• Scientists think the common cold may at last be beatable
• Why are some icebergs an emerald green color?
• Episode 4: The Wave of the Future
• The internet goes wild after Trump's 'If I win' pledge
• Trump's 'nasty woman' attack will only make Hillary Clinton stronger
• Hilarious hashtag on how Trump interprets classic literature
• Shop the Shark FlexStyle for 20% off at Amazon
• Lady Gaga and Mark Ronson clap back at Patrick Carney's trash talk