California just became the first state to require that all new homes be seduceri eroticeinstalled with solar panels, a continuation of its ambitious plans to completely wean itself off fossil fuels within two decades.
All five members of the California Energy Commission voted for the mandate Wednesday morning, which will go into effect on January 1, 2020 for single family or "multi-family" buildings three stories or less. Other, less visible standards were also put in place, like improved window insulation to contain costly, climate-controlled air.
The state -- which is itself the world's fifth largest economy -- is already well on its way to meeting aggressive renewable energy goals. State law requires California to generate half its power from renewables like wind and solar by 2030. Utilities say they'll likely meet this goal 10 years ahead of schedule, in 2020.
SEE ALSO: Leonardo DiCaprio's latest venture seeks to bring rural dwellers out of the darkSolar panels on new homes can certainly be a boon, powering your fridge and air conditioning during the day while sending any excess power back into the grid. But they won't be as significant as other, less flashy mandates.
"They speak to the future," Michael Picker, president of the California Public Utilities Commission, an agency separate from the state's energy commission, said in an interview.
"But a much more brilliant solution were energy efficiency standards," said Picker, referring to the 1970s-era rules mandating that antiquated, power-hungry appliances become far more efficient. While energy demand has doubled across the U.S. since the 1970s, California's has remained flat, even with its active economy and burgeoning population, said Picker.
"It's hard for people to love [the 1970s' mandate], because people don’t see it," he said. "Solar is not bad, but it's expensive and it does produce new challenges."
There are some grievances about added costs from installing solar, which the state estimates could tack on over $10,000 to building a new home. But the energy commission said new homes with solar panels will cut energy use by over half, saving homeowners around $80 a month.
"That is something that is paying across over the lifetime of the building," Hope Corsair, program director and associate professor in electrical engineering and renewable energy at the Oregon Institute of Technology, said in an interview.
Overall, the price of producing solar energy has dropped significantly, mostly because the price of photovoltaic solar panels -- the type mandated on Californian homes -- has dropped, the U.S. Department of Energy said last year.
Corsair said that in concept, this solar mandate "is great," especially in places that have a lot of power demand, but not enough supply. Solar installations can pick up the slack here, without emitting heat-trapping greenhouse gases.
But, Corsair cautions that "the problem starts when you install solar in a location that already has enough power."
During the day, especially at high noon when the sun is directly overhead, the panels will typically produce too much energy.
"This energy has to go somewhere," she said, and that means that it will be sent back into the greater electric grid. (Most homeowners don't have expensive battery storage units like like Telsa's Powerwall). This can certainly be a good thing -- providing clean power for the area to use. But much of today's power grid isn't capable of accepting flows of energy back into the grid, when it's already pouring loads of energy out into the community. Corsiar related this to trying to pour water back into an active sprinkler -- it's just can't be done.
"The power grid is far more complex than water piping," said Corsair, and if there's too much energy being pumped back into the grid, equipment can be damaged, or certain power plants may have to be turn on and off, causing overall increases in carbon pollution. This has actually happened in Germany, she said.
"You can only move so much power over a transmission line," said Corsair. "You’ll find parts of the electrical grid that are 75 or 100 years old."
Solar panels on homes won't be California's renewable savior in and of itself, but they will be part of the greater renewable solution. "It'snot any one thing that works," said Picker, citing that tightly-sealed insulation in homes and efficient appliances continue to contribute to the carbon-mitigation effort.
Even when California homes are powered almost entirely by renewables like solar, they may still need to rely on some natural gas-burning for some time, even if these carbon-emitting plants are only used for around 200 hours a year, said Picker. When the sun starts setting, especially when it's hot, solar power alone won't be able to power many homes, requiring energy producing "peekers" to rapidly fire up and meet demand.
"You need something you can spin up real fast," said Picker. "It's a counter-effect, and we can deal with it."
Exactly how much electricity California will produce on new rooftops in the Golden State's neighborhoods isn't known. But it relies on one major factor.
"It depends on how much new building construction there is," said Picker.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders condemns harassment. She should tell Trump.RBG, Twitter is down on its knees, begging you please to stayThe 15 best ranking memes, rankedApple is working on three new Macs, regulatory filings showChrissy Teigen Instagrams truly spectacular meme of herself and John LegendThe 21 best video games for couples to coHow to correct Siri's pronunciationChrissy Teigen Instagrams truly spectacular meme of herself and John LegendOrlando Police did not renew surveillance partnership with AmazonHow to correct Siri's pronunciation'Stranger Things 4' reveals not one but two release datesAnnapolis shooting survivor on Trump: 'We need more than prayers'15 of the best movies on Sundance Now for when you want something specialUnderrated apps that let video content creators produce slick, trendy, subtitled videos'Worldle' and 'Globle' are 'Wordle' with mapsTwitter adds ether to Tips feature, joining bitcoinHow to see your Uber rider ratingsLobsters are terrifying immortal beings, sort ofQueer people are finding love on TikTok'The Book of Boba Fett' review: Disney's Star Wars fan service is suffocating Sentience and Intensities: A Conversation with Maureen McLane by Anahid Nersessian “Daddy Was a Number Runner” by Deesha Philyaw Tolstoy’s Uncommon Sense and Common Nonsense by Yiyun Li Redux: No Human Tongue by The Paris Review Best free online courses from UC Berkeley All You Have to Do Is Die by Rowan Hisayo Buchanan Allowing Things to Happen: An Interview with Tyshawn Sorey by Craig Morgan Teicher Redux: The Subway Back and Forth by The Paris Review Hunter’s Moon by Nina MacLaughlin Eavesdropping in the Archives: Six Artist Portraits by Aisha Sabatini Sloan and Lester Sloan A Philosophical Game: An Interview with Saul Steinberg by Lauren Kane Alternative Routes: A Conversation with Lauren Elkin by Claire 2024 movie preview: From 'Mean Girls' to 'Joker: Folie à Deux' and more Fourteenth and Jackson by José Vadi Spiky Washes by The Paris Review White Gods by Anna Della Subin Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra hands The best Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra preorder deals you can get right now Redux: Too Sweet a Muddle by The Paris Review Bezos as Novelist by Mark McGurl
3.4861s , 10220.7109375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【seduceri erotice】,Defense Information Network