【Sorority (2025)】

Oklahoma Rep. Jim Bridenstine's bid to become President Donald Trump's NASA chief lives to see another day... barely.

The Sorority (2025)Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation voted to advance Bridenstine's nomination to the full Senate on Wednesday, however, it wasn't smooth sailing for the Republican congressman.

While 14 Republicans voted to advance Bridenstine's nomination, all 13 of the committee's Democrats opposed him.

SEE ALSO: Trump's pick for NASA chief has an appalling record on LGBTQ rights, and that matters for the space agency

This kind of party-line vote for a NASA administrator is somewhat unheard of in modern times. NASA's last administrator, former astronaut Charles Bolden, got the job after a unanimous vote in his favor by the full Senate.

However, the contentious vote wasn't exactly a surprise in Bridenstine's case.

Jim Bridenstine. Credit: Sue Ogrocki/AP/REX/Shutterstock

Committee Democrats grilled him during his hearing last week, pointing out that Bridenstine's history of partisan politics and scarce science experience should make everyone think critically about whether he should lead the agency tasked with taking us to space and inspiring children around the world.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

"... Last week, we had a hearing on a NASA nominee that was as contentious as any nomination hearing this committee has had, and far more contentious than has been the case historically for a NASA administrator," Florida Senator Bill Nelson, who flew to space aboard a NASA space shuttle, said during his opening remarks.

Controversy surrounding Bridenstine's nomination centers around the fact that he's a conservative politician.

Bridenstine has railed against the legalization of same-sex marriage, and, in the past, he straight-up denied that climate change is human-caused, something that contradicts NASA's own research on the subject.

Via Giphy

This committee vote could also mean that Bridenstine's nomination will garner opposition when it reaches the full Senate.

If the vote again falls along party lines, Bridenstine will just barely squeak by with the job, but if Senate Democrats manage to flip some Republicans to their side -- something that Nelson at least seems to be angling for -- things could get more interesting.

Nelson quoted Republican Senator Marco Rubio during his opening statements criticizing Bridenstine:

The NASA administrator must have a strong scientific or technical background. And the NASA administrator must not be political. This is the point that my colleague Senator Rubio was making, when, after being asked about his concerns over the administration’s nomination of a politician to head NASA, he said “I just think it could be devastating for the space program.” And he said further “It’s the one federal mission which has largely been free of politics and it’s at a critical juncture in its history.”

Nelson and the 12 other Democrats on the committee think that Bridenstine's politics should disqualify him from becoming NASA administrator.

Let's see what the rest of the Senate has to say.

---

Featured Video For You

---

Why NASA doesn't have enough money

---

• Science
• Deals
• Social Good
• Digital Culture
• Games
• Tech
• Entertainment
• Shopping

• Trump signs AI education order to train K
• In the end, the Azor Ahai prophecy did come true on 'Game of Thrones'
• Chevy cars won't let teen drivers start driving until they buckle up
• Another day, another baby with an inconceivably full head of hair
• NYT Strands hints, answers for April 14
• This 'Game of Thrones' meme is brilliant and should be studied in any film class
• Airbnb sells out hosts in NYC lawsuit settlement
• Fake 'drunk' Nancy Pelosi video goes viral, and it wasn’t even that hard to make
• NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for May 18: Tips to solve Connections #237
• Mysterious bread sponge is desperately trying to be 'the dress'

• It’s Not Magic, It’s Just a Camera
• Wednesday, February 15: Morgan Parker at BAM
• Readability vs. Difficulty (That Classic Debate)
• Staff Picks: Anthony Heilbut, Caryl Churchill, Carl Phillips
• Three Essays Celebrating Paula Fox (1923–2017)
• Revisited: Mystery and Melancholy of a Street
• Real Polaroids, Fake People: Duane Hanson’s Photos of His Lifelike Sculptures
• Thomas Lux, 1946–2017
• Garfield’s Gender Identity Caused a Fierce Wikipedia Dispute
• This Guy Really, Really, Really Loved Books—Maybe Too Much

• Draper vs. Arnaldi 2025 livestream: Watch Madrid Open for free
• Another day, another baby with an inconceivably full head of hair
• Meet your new hero, an ascot
• Watch Samsung's AI turn Mona Lisa into a talking head video
• Best Kindle Unlimited deal: Get 3 months of Kindle Unlimited for 99 cents
• Game of Thrones actor Jerome Flynn will advise a vegan crypto project
• Fake 'drunk' Nancy Pelosi video goes viral, and it wasn’t even that hard to make
• It was a bit too easy for this woman to convince her husband she adopted a coyote
• President Trump says semiconductor tariffs are next
• Here's why it's hard to get a wheelchair

• Amazon Pet Day: All the best deals
• What's coming to Amazon Prime Video in June 2019
• Hire someone to make your wedding hashtag because #itshardtobeclever
• 'Aladdin' review roundup: What critics thought of Disney's remake
• Things Intel Needs to Fix
• Gwendoline Christie correctly predicted who would end up on the Iron Throne 2 whole years ago
• DJ Khaled will get you there as the new voice on Waze
• It was a bit too easy for this woman to convince her husband she adopted a coyote
• NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for April 26: Tips to solve Connections #215
• Woman destroys Donald Trump in merciless Twitter rant