The Han Yi-seul-I (한이슬) Archivespresident wants you to believe he came up with the term, "fake news." But, of course, that's fake news, too.
Wednesday night, Donald Trump sat down with Fox News's lump-filled suit of a human, Lou Dobbs, to sundown on broadcast television, as he's wont to do. This time, it was largely on the matter of the very bad and fake news, a term for which he might as well have a patent, he explained.
SEE ALSO: How Trump’s four hours in Puerto Rico revealed his Achilles' heel"I have come up with some pretty good names for people," Trump said, referencing his penchant for ascribing ridiculous (though often catchy!) nicknames to rivals along the campaign trail. "There's -- I think one of the best names is -- you know, I’ve really started this whole 'fake news' thing."
The term "fake news" dates back to at least 1890, according to Merriam-Webster. That year, a headline in the Cincinnati Commercial Tribuneread, "Secretary Brunnell declares fake news about his people is being telegraphed over the country."
If Trump's actually done anything for the term, it's simply use the words "fake news," as a way to bash stories he doesn't like without offering proof those stories aren't valid. While creating fake news, himself.
"What could be more fake than CBS, and NBC, and ABC, and CNN when you look at some of these stories?" Trump asked Dobbs. Then, skipping a few sentences to find something coherent, Trump explained: "If you look at it from the day I started running to now, I’m so proud that I have been able to convince people how fake it is."
Whether Trump has convinced people of that or not, a striking number of voters actually do believe media outlets make up stories about the president and his team, according to a recent poll released by Politicoand Morning Consult. According to Politico, 46 percent of poll respondents said they believe journalists make up stories about Trump, while just 37 percent said they didn't believe it. As for whether or not this story about Trump claiming to make up the term "fake news" as fake news itself, that hinges on whether or not you think a dictionary is complicit in the media's lies. And if you do, then guess you wouldn't get anything out of looking up "Stockholm syndrome" either.
Previous:Peasants of Code
Staff Picks: Raymond Pettibon, Jane Campion, Maggie DohertyWhen Your Conscience Has a Headache: The Gossip HangoverBest Dyson Prime Day deals: Save up to $170 on Dyson cordless vacuums at WalmartPoem: Molly Peacock, “The Distance Up Close”Best Prime Day deals for parents and kids: Baby monitors, air purifiers, and Fire tabletsMondays Have Always Been Blue—Even Before the PseudosciencePrime Day iPad deal: Score an iPad (10th gen) for its lowest price everShakespeare’s First Folio Goes on a Wild CrossSolawave Prime Day: Score 40% off Solawave productsQueen Bitch: Alex Abramovich on David BowieQueen Bitch: Alex Abramovich on David BowieThe Mr. Mantarian Subterfuge: A Story of Dog Boarding9 horny and romantic books that will completely consume youDavid Bowie’s 100 Favorite BooksParty on the Thames: The “Frost Fairs” of the Little Ice AgeStar Wars and Headspace let you practice mindfulness in a galaxy far, far awayJanet Fish: Glass & PlasticAmazon Prime Members get a free 3When the Used Book Salesman Insults Your Harlequin RomancesMondays Have Always Been Blue—Even Before the Pseudoscience Unnamed and Unsurveilled Pod Save Antarctica Mad Dogs and Medical Bills Austerity Blues Terminal Diagnosis Necessary Anger A Case of the Icks Poetic Justice Reactionary GIFs The Vanishing Onward, Christian Soldiers The Baffler Welcomes Fiction Editor J. W. McCormack The Tears of the Taxed Heaven Help Us Nothing to Learn The Long Arm of the Law The Poet of Infinite Longing There’s Always Money in the Banana Stand Small Worlds Speed Freaks
2.3779s , 8199.0390625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Han Yi-seul-I (한이슬) Archives】,Defense Information Network